why health care costs can never fall as a % of GDP, Part One
October 7th, 2009 by Al Lewis (alewis)This is the first in a series of blogs over the next week to explain why we need to get used to health care expenses continuing to rise, unless we are willing to discuss the R word (rationing).
If all doctors and hospitals did was the same procedures we did 30 years ago, spending would be way down. Total hip replacements, for example, were 16-day stays in the early 1980s. Now they are often four days or fewer. In the 1960s cataracts were a 3-week inpatient stay requiring sandbagging (does anyone even remember sandbagging?), surgery done only as a last resort.
Tags: health care reform, healthcare costs, healthcare policy, healthcare spending






December 13th, 2009 at 5:06 pm
Rationing is the magic word. Your write - up in Oobonomics about the use of the hospice-style “end of life” specialists instead of the “extension of life” specialists would be a good place to start. There is a special person specifically trained and designated for a similar type of PR work on organ harvest teams. They know all the right things to say to convince a family that the best thing to do in their tragic situation is to help someone else by the donation of the organs of their brain dead relative - and they get all the appropriate papers signed in a time-expedient fashion.
I googled Medicare DRG 541 after reading about it in Oobonomics and have it on my agenda to show your write-up to a hospital comptroller for his take on it.
Certainly it would help if the profit motive were somehow minimized.
DB