Comments on: Abortion Coverage Would Cost $1 Per Month http://www.whytheheck.com/2009/11/11/abortion-coverage-would-cost-1-per-month/ Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:45:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: dblacklock http://www.whytheheck.com/2009/11/11/abortion-coverage-would-cost-1-per-month/comment-page-1/#comment-940 dblacklock Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:31:44 +0000 http://www.thinkoob.com/?p=795#comment-940 Wasn't the bet $5 in "Trading Places?" DB Wasn’t the bet $5 in “Trading Places?”

DB

]]> By: Tooz http://www.whytheheck.com/2009/11/11/abortion-coverage-would-cost-1-per-month/comment-page-1/#comment-918 Tooz Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:41:12 +0000 http://www.thinkoob.com/?p=795#comment-918 Regardless of whatever side of the issue people take, the abortion issue can never be apolitical, so whether the cost of abortion coverage is negligent or $50/month/person, it's still going to be an issue. It will be allowed or not allowed, covered or not covered, based on the usbject, not the cost. Regardless of whatever side of the issue people take, the abortion issue can never be apolitical, so whether the cost of abortion coverage is negligent or $50/month/person, it’s still going to be an issue. It will be allowed or not allowed, covered or not covered, based on the usbject, not the cost.

]]> By: alewis http://www.whytheheck.com/2009/11/11/abortion-coverage-would-cost-1-per-month/comment-page-1/#comment-916 alewis Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:03:15 +0000 http://www.thinkoob.com/?p=795#comment-916 Actually, the "over a dollar" think was supposed to be an apolitical observation, as this is an apolitical website dedicated to original insights, of which this was one. Pro or con, no one has pointed out that we are talking $1 a month here. For people who support health reform, that insight suggests that they should suck it up and vote for it with the rider. Actually, the “over a dollar” think was supposed to be an apolitical observation, as this is an apolitical website dedicated to original insights, of which this was one. Pro or con, no one has pointed out that we are talking $1 a month here. For people who support health reform, that insight suggests that they should suck it up and vote for it with the rider.

]]> By: Tooz http://www.whytheheck.com/2009/11/11/abortion-coverage-would-cost-1-per-month/comment-page-1/#comment-915 Tooz Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:34:14 +0000 http://www.thinkoob.com/?p=795#comment-915 It's not about the cost, Al, it's about the moral issue. Believe it or not, the majority of the population is opposed to the murder of babies as a method of birth control. So yes, I add my voice to the fuss "over a dollar". You've heard the squeeky wheel gets the oil? That's exactly how this holocaust was permitted to start in the US - the abortion proponents made a whole lot more noise than the opponents. And yes, it's a holocaust, with over 40,000,000 killed so far. The majority tends to be silent, much to the detriment of this country. If everyone expressed their opinions, we wouldn't have had the pork-filled stimulus and we wouldn't be threatend by the government tax and power grab of the health care/insurance issue and cap-and-trade issue. It’s not about the cost, Al, it’s about the moral issue. Believe it or not, the majority of the population is opposed to the murder of babies as a method of birth control. So yes, I add my voice to the fuss “over a dollar”.

You’ve heard the squeeky wheel gets the oil? That’s exactly how this holocaust was permitted to start in the US - the abortion proponents made a whole lot more noise than the opponents. And yes, it’s a holocaust, with over 40,000,000 killed so far.

The majority tends to be silent, much to the detriment of this country. If everyone expressed their opinions, we wouldn’t have had the pork-filled stimulus and we wouldn’t be threatend by the government tax and power grab of the health care/insurance issue and cap-and-trade issue.

]]>