<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revised Shupak Abortion Rider Proposal Following All Your Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whytheheck.com/2009/11/16/revised-shupak-abortion-rider-proposal-following-all-your-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whytheheck.com/2009/11/16/revised-shupak-abortion-rider-proposal-following-all-your-comments/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.whytheheck.com/2009/11/16/revised-shupak-abortion-rider-proposal-following-all-your-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkoob.com/?p=802#comment-944</guid>
		<description>That's a nice irrelevant test to use in the case of abortion. No one is suggesting that every pregnancy is aborted, so to use the test is simply a distraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a nice irrelevant test to use in the case of abortion. No one is suggesting that every pregnancy is aborted, so to use the test is simply a distraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tooz</title>
		<link>http://www.whytheheck.com/2009/11/16/revised-shupak-abortion-rider-proposal-following-all-your-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Tooz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkoob.com/?p=802#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Al - you picked a controversial subject, to say the least.

Yes, I believe abortion is murder. No, I don't want it covered by my insurance or tax dollars. However, I make exceptions in cases of rape, incest and the extremely rare case of a threat to the life of the expectant mother - with the caviat that every effort must be made to avoid those abortions, too (adoption by parents who really want a baby, for instance.)

Does that make me an "extreme rightist"? If that is the case, you label the majority of those on the right as "extreme"!

I know stopping abortion will take the Supreme Court, and at the risk of beating a dead horse, put abortion to the "Society Test": If all of society did "it", would society be better off?

Abortion: no, because humankind would die off at the end of the generation (zero babies born). Murder: no, because humankind would die off at the end of this generation. So what's the difference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al - you picked a controversial subject, to say the least.</p>
<p>Yes, I believe abortion is murder. No, I don&#8217;t want it covered by my insurance or tax dollars. However, I make exceptions in cases of rape, incest and the extremely rare case of a threat to the life of the expectant mother - with the caviat that every effort must be made to avoid those abortions, too (adoption by parents who really want a baby, for instance.)</p>
<p>Does that make me an &#8220;extreme rightist&#8221;? If that is the case, you label the majority of those on the right as &#8220;extreme&#8221;!</p>
<p>I know stopping abortion will take the Supreme Court, and at the risk of beating a dead horse, put abortion to the &#8220;Society Test&#8221;: If all of society did &#8220;it&#8221;, would society be better off?</p>
<p>Abortion: no, because humankind would die off at the end of the generation (zero babies born). Murder: no, because humankind would die off at the end of this generation. So what&#8217;s the difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.whytheheck.com/2009/11/16/revised-shupak-abortion-rider-proposal-following-all-your-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkoob.com/?p=802#comment-919</guid>
		<description>Comments following Montel Williams interview:  He pointed out that many people aren't simply going to go along with this just becuase the rider is free.  And I said, "yes, but we aren't trying to get the extremists.  We are trying to get the reasonable people in the middle to accept a compromise where all beliefs are respected."   

I don't expect to get the extreme leftists who say, abortion should be in the basic benefit period as a matter of principle (even if the Shupak rider would cost less), or the extreme rightists who don't want it covered at all, even in a rider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comments following Montel Williams interview:  He pointed out that many people aren&#8217;t simply going to go along with this just becuase the rider is free.  And I said, &#8220;yes, but we aren&#8217;t trying to get the extremists.  We are trying to get the reasonable people in the middle to accept a compromise where all beliefs are respected.&#8221;   </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t expect to get the extreme leftists who say, abortion should be in the basic benefit period as a matter of principle (even if the Shupak rider would cost less), or the extreme rightists who don&#8217;t want it covered at all, even in a rider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

